% Active result tables. A dash denotes an unreported or unmeasured value.
\begin{table*}[t]
\caption{Dense future-activity mAP (\%) at ten horizons on EasyCom and
Ego4D. Each dataset has the same four-method comparison. Archived EasyCom
rows use Sessions~1--3; $\G$ has only 0.2-s and mean scores. The SVA
curve is user-reported, with split and run provenance pending verification;
its mean is computed from the displayed rounded values. Ego4D scores are
pending. Dashes are unreported or unmeasured,
not zero; intermediate scores are never interpolated. The available Omni
rows are exploratory and not all training-matched.}
\label{tab:main}
\centering\ninept
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{0.91}
\begin{tabular*}{\textwidth}{@{\extracolsep{\fill}}lccccccccccc@{}}
\toprule
& \multicolumn{10}{c}{Prediction horizon (s)} & \\
\cmidrule(lr){2-11}
Dataset / model & .2 & .4 & .6 & .8 & 1.0 & 1.2 & 1.4 & 1.6 & 1.8 & 2.0 & Mean \\
\midrule
\multicolumn{12}{@{}l}{\emph{EasyCom}} \\
EgoSpeak A+V & 74.20 & 68.35 & 64.31 & 61.13 & 59.77 & 58.81 & 57.50 & 57.09 & 55.95 & 54.82 & 61.19 \\
Omni $\G$ & 73.45 & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & 60.85 \\
Omni $\G+\A$ & 81.72 & 75.92 & 70.38 & 66.46 & 63.81 & 61.37 & 60.00 & 58.32 & 56.95 & 56.16 & 65.11 \\
Omni $\G+\A+\mathrm{SVA}$ & 82.36 & 76.26 & 70.89 & 66.67 & 63.73 & 61.52 & 60.10 & 58.63 & 57.35 & 56.20 & 65.37 \\
\midrule
\multicolumn{12}{@{}l}{\emph{Ego4D}} \\
EgoSpeak A+V & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- \\
Omni $\G$ & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- \\
Omni $\G+\A$ & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- \\
Omni $\G+\A+\mathrm{SVA}$ & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular*}
\end{table*}

\begin{table}[t]
\caption{EasyCom local-vision and information-audit screens (\%). The
upper rows are exploratory encoder-based runs; the lower rows use
non-deployable past activity (three-seed mean $\pm$ SD). Their training
protocols differ, so cross-section differences are not matched effects.
Branch names are defined in Sec.~\ref{sec:method}.}
\label{tab:visual}
\centering\ninept
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{0.92}
\setlength{\tabcolsep}{3pt}
\begin{tabular}{@{}lcc@{}}
\toprule
Condition & mAP$_{.2}$ & Mean \\
\midrule
$\G+\A$ & 81.72 & 65.11 \\
$\G+\A+$Pool & 82.03 & 65.40 \\
$\G+\A+$SVA & 82.36 & 65.37 \\
$\G+\A+$TSVA & 82.38 & 65.54 \\
\midrule
Visibility only & $81.95{\pm}.10$ & $65.22{\pm}.05$ \\
Delayed 1 s & $81.95{\pm}.09$ & $65.34{\pm}.05$ \\
Visible OR & $\mathbf{86.70{\pm}.09}$ & $\mathbf{66.95{\pm}.02}$ \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{table}

\begin{table}[t]
\caption{Pending matched timing/context tests. Each cell will compare
$\G$ with $\G+\A$ on common cutoffs; $\Delta$ is paired mean-mAP gain.
PTR uses completed blocks plus the observed tail. Dashes are unmeasured.}
\label{tab:stream_context}
\centering\ninept
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{0.92}
\setlength{\tabcolsep}{3pt}
\begin{tabular}{@{}llcc@{}}
\toprule
Group & Refresh / cap & $\G/\G+\A$ & $\Delta$ \\
\midrule
T & Completed hold, 8 s & --/-- & -- \\
T & PTR, 8 s & --/-- & -- \\
\midrule
C & PTR, 2 s & --/-- & -- \\
C & PTR, 4 s & --/-- & -- \\
C & PTR, 6 s & --/-- & -- \\
C & PTR, 8 s & --/-- & -- \\
C & PTR, 10 s & --/-- & -- \\
C & PTR, 12 s & --/-- & -- \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{table}

\begin{table}[t]
\caption{Separate seed-0 global-only chunk screen (\%): 10 epochs, 8-s cap,
2-FPS video. PTR is not extraction-matched to the other rows. Calls are
processor invocations across 12 sessions, not latency.}
\label{tab:chunk}
\centering\ninept
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{0.95}
\setlength{\tabcolsep}{3pt}
\begin{tabular}{@{}lccc@{}}
\toprule
Global construction & mAP$_{.2}$ & Mean & Calls \\
\midrule
Native 2-s hold & 59.62 & 55.19 & 9,539 \\
200-ms commits & 67.05 & 57.84 & 95,453 \\
PTR & 70.85 & 59.17 & -- \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{table}