Update manuscript

This commit is contained in:
Xin Wang
2026-08-31 14:18:20 +08:00
parent 383a3b72c6
commit 87aff8f00e
6 changed files with 78 additions and 13 deletions

19
manuscript/README.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
# Manuscript workspace
```text
manuscript/
ICASSP2026_Paper_Templates/ # official template assets; keep unmodified
main/ # editable paper source and isolated build
```
The active source is [`main/main.tex`](main/main.tex). Compile it with:
```bash
cd manuscript/main
make
```
The generated PDF is `main/build/main.pdf`. Build artifacts are ignored by
Git. The repository currently contains the ICASSP 2026 author kit; the paper
source is labeled as an ICASSP 2027 draft and must be checked against the 2027
kit when it becomes available.

1
manuscript/main/.gitignore vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
/build/

14
manuscript/main/Makefile Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
LATEXMK ?= latexmk
TEMPLATE_DIR := $(abspath ../ICASSP2026_Paper_Templates)
export TEXINPUTS := $(TEMPLATE_DIR):
export BSTINPUTS := $(TEMPLATE_DIR):
.PHONY: all clean
all:
mkdir -p build
$(LATEXMK) -pdf -interaction=nonstopmode -halt-on-error -outdir=build main.tex
clean:
$(LATEXMK) -C -outdir=build main.tex

30
manuscript/main/README.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
# Main ICASSP manuscript
This is the editable paper directory. It uses the unmodified official ICASSP
2026 LaTeX assets stored in `../ICASSP2026_Paper_Templates/`. When the ICASSP
2027 author kit is released, replace or add the official template and update
`TEMPLATE_DIR` in the Makefile only after checking the new instructions.
Compile from this directory:
```bash
make
```
The PDF and all intermediate files are written to `build/`; only source files
belong in Git.
Current source layout:
```text
main/
main.tex
references.bib
Makefile
README.md
build/ # generated, ignored
```
The author/affiliation, final results, Method, Experimental Setup, Results and
Conclusion are still explicit TODOs. Do not turn planned experiments into
reported findings.

View File

@@ -1,16 +1,17 @@
% Draft ICASSP 2027 manuscript. % Draft ICASSP 2027 manuscript using the official ICASSP 2026 template
% Compile from this directory with: % currently bundled in this repository. Replace the template when the ICASSP
% pdflatex main && bibtex main && pdflatex main && pdflatex main % 2027 author kit is released.
% Compile from this directory with: make
\documentclass{article} \documentclass{article}
\usepackage{ICASSP2026_Paper_Templates/spconf} \usepackage{spconf}
\usepackage{amsmath,graphicx,hyperref} \usepackage{amsmath,graphicx,hyperref}
\title{NOT EVERY TURN IS MINE: ADDRESSEE-GROUNDED FLOOR-ENTRY PROJECTION IN EGOCENTRIC MULTIPARTY CONVERSATION} \title{NOT EVERY TURN IS MINE: ADDRESSEE-GROUNDED FLOOR-ENTRY PROJECTION IN EGOCENTRIC MULTIPARTY CONVERSATION}
% TODO: Replace these placeholders after the ICASSP 2027 review policy and % TODO: Insert the final author list and affiliations after the ICASSP 2027
% author list are finalized. % review policy and author order are finalized.
\name{Author Name(s)} \name{Internal Manuscript Draft}
\address{Author Affiliation(s)} \address{}
\begin{document} \begin{document}
\ninept \ninept
@@ -31,8 +32,8 @@ exchanges and measures false entries at matched response recall, together with
decision latency. Wrong-person and time-shifted visual controls test whether decision latency. Wrong-person and time-shifted visual controls test whether
any improvement follows correct social grounding rather than additional model any improvement follows correct social grounding rather than additional model
capacity. Experiments on EasyCom, with Ego4D as an activity-forecasting capacity. Experiments on EasyCom, with Ego4D as an activity-forecasting
generalization set, show \textbf{[TODO: insert the final matched-recall and generalization set, will evaluate this hypothesis under a strictly causal
latency results]}. protocol.
\end{abstract} \end{abstract}
\begin{keywords} \begin{keywords}
@@ -43,8 +44,8 @@ audio-visual learning
\section{Introduction} \section{Introduction}
\label{sec:intro} \label{sec:intro}
Low-latency conversational agents must continuously decide whether to speak or Conversational agents must continuously decide whether to speak or keep
to keep listening. In a dyadic exchange, a pause or an apparent end of turn is listening. In a dyadic exchange, a pause or an apparent end of turn is
often treated as an invitation to respond. This assumption fails in often treated as an invitation to respond. This assumption fails in
multiparty interaction: one participant may finish an utterance addressed to multiparty interaction: one participant may finish an utterance addressed to
another participant, and an egocentric agent that reacts only to acoustic another participant, and an egocentric agent that reacts only to acoustic
@@ -104,7 +105,7 @@ extra feature capacity or globally conservative predictions.
% TODO: Add Method, Experimental Setup, Results, and Conclusion after the % TODO: Add Method, Experimental Setup, Results, and Conclusion after the
% event protocol and person-aligned model are frozen. % event protocol and person-aligned model are frozen.
\bibliographystyle{ICASSP2026_Paper_Templates/IEEEbib} \bibliographystyle{IEEEbib}
\bibliography{references} \bibliography{references}
\end{document} \end{document}