Record EgoSpeak three-level evaluation
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
|
||||
# EasyCom EgoSpeak three-level evaluation
|
||||
|
||||
This record freezes the first Sessions 1--3 evaluation of the released
|
||||
EgoSpeak MiniROADA audio-visual checkpoint under three deliberately separate
|
||||
questions. The values below were produced on the remote experiment host; the
|
||||
aggregate console output was copied into this record on 2026-09-16. Generated
|
||||
prediction and per-event artifacts remain on that host and are not committed.
|
||||
|
||||
## Protocol and split
|
||||
|
||||
- Test split: EasyCom Sessions 1--3.
|
||||
- Model: released EgoSpeak MiniROADA audio-visual checkpoint.
|
||||
- Dense forecasting: framewise AP for background, wearer, and aggregate
|
||||
others at ten horizons from 0.2 to 2.0 seconds.
|
||||
- Raw boundary anticipation: threshold-free AP for wearer `OFF->ON` and
|
||||
`ON->OFF` changes. These are timing-derived diagnostics, not semantic EOT or
|
||||
INT claims.
|
||||
- Opportunity-conditioned behavior: one causally censored activity-derived
|
||||
score per reviewed ENTRY or INT/YIELD opportunity. Labels are provisional
|
||||
two-pass LLM-assisted reviews and have not been human reviewed.
|
||||
- No test-set threshold is fitted for any AP reported here. Session 4 is needed
|
||||
only for threshold-dependent operating points, which are intentionally not
|
||||
summarized as headline findings in this record.
|
||||
|
||||
## Findings
|
||||
|
||||
Dense forecasting reaches **74.124% mAP at 0.2 s** and **61.155% mean mAP**
|
||||
over ten horizons. The wearer class alone reaches 63.750% AP at 0.2 s and
|
||||
53.493% averaged over horizons. Restricting evaluation to causally valid rows
|
||||
changes mean mAP by only +0.038 percentage points (61.193% versus 61.155%).
|
||||
|
||||
Raw wearer onset and offset anticipation obtain **24.491%** and **38.024%**
|
||||
mean AP, respectively. These lower values do not contradict the dense result:
|
||||
dense AP rewards correct future state over sustained regions, whereas a raw
|
||||
boundary event is counted once and has many harder non-boundary comparisons.
|
||||
|
||||
On the provisional opportunity labels, ENTRY AP is **52.487%** for 163
|
||||
positives and 335 hard negatives, versus 32.731% positive prevalence
|
||||
(+19.756 points; 1.60x prevalence). INT/YIELD AP is **20.135%** for 28 positives
|
||||
and 109 hard negatives, essentially equal to its 20.438% prevalence. This is
|
||||
consistent with the output contract: wearer probability can rank many entry
|
||||
opportunities, but `1-p(wearer)` does not encode whether an interruption should
|
||||
cause a yield. The ENTRY and INT loaders additionally exclude 81 and 5
|
||||
invalid/post-outcome cases; these exclusions require an audit before any final
|
||||
paper claim.
|
||||
|
||||
## Relation to EgoSpeak Figure 7
|
||||
|
||||
Figure 7 of EgoSpeak plots a continuous target/wearer-speaking confidence over
|
||||
ground-truth speaking regions. It therefore corresponds most directly to the
|
||||
dense **wearer AP**, not to raw onset/offset AP or semantic ENTRY/YIELD AP. A
|
||||
visually convincing dense curve can coexist with weak boundary or semantic
|
||||
selectivity. The figure caption does not identify one forecast horizon, and it
|
||||
uses the paper's Transformer variants rather than proving the aggregate result
|
||||
of this MiniROADA run.
|
||||
|
||||
For our eventual qualitative figure, the continuous wearer curve can be kept,
|
||||
but it should also show the causal opportunity anchor, event boundary,
|
||||
competing-risk censor, and the single score assigned to each positive or hard
|
||||
negative.
|
||||
|
||||
## Interpretation limits
|
||||
|
||||
- The three metric layers answer different questions and their similar numeric
|
||||
values must not be equated.
|
||||
- Aggregate `others` activity cannot identify a particular speaker, addressee,
|
||||
semantic EOT, or interruption intent.
|
||||
- The opportunity result is provisional until label/exclusion audit and human
|
||||
review; it is useful for baseline diagnosis, not a final confirmatory claim.
|
||||
- This is one released checkpoint, not a multi-seed uncertainty estimate.
|
||||
|
||||
Machine-readable curves and counts are in [`summary.json`](summary.json) and
|
||||
the compact comparison is in [`metrics.csv`](metrics.csv). The opportunity
|
||||
protocol and reproduction command are documented in
|
||||
[`docs/easycom_opportunity_event_evaluation.md`](../../docs/easycom_opportunity_event_evaluation.md).
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
||||
layer,metric,horizon_seconds,value_percent,num_positive,num_hard_negative,positive_prevalence_percent
|
||||
dense,dense_mAP,0.2,74.124,,,
|
||||
dense,dense_mean_mAP,mean,61.155,,,
|
||||
dense,wearer_AP,0.2,63.750,,,
|
||||
dense,wearer_mean_AP,mean,53.493,,,
|
||||
raw_boundary,wearer_onset_mean_AP,mean,24.491,,,
|
||||
raw_boundary,wearer_offset_mean_AP,mean,38.024,,,
|
||||
opportunity,ENTRY_AP,opportunity,52.4867,163,335,32.7309
|
||||
opportunity,INT_YIELD_AP,opportunity,20.1349,28,109,20.4380
|
||||
|
||||
|
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"recorded_at": "2026-09-16",
|
||||
"source": "user-provided remote experiment output",
|
||||
"dataset": "EasyCom",
|
||||
"sessions": ["Session_1", "Session_2", "Session_3"],
|
||||
"model": "EgoSpeak MiniROADA audio-visual released checkpoint",
|
||||
"scale": "percent",
|
||||
"dense_forecasting": {
|
||||
"horizons_seconds": [0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, 2.0],
|
||||
"full_timeline": {
|
||||
"map": [74.124, 68.291, 64.267, 61.091, 59.734, 58.774, 57.471, 57.064, 55.933, 54.802],
|
||||
"background_ap": [67.957, 58.434, 52.256, 47.545, 46.106, 45.787, 43.552, 43.491, 42.212, 40.345],
|
||||
"wearer_ap": [63.750, 59.595, 56.614, 54.163, 52.903, 51.471, 50.745, 49.721, 48.587, 47.376],
|
||||
"others_ap": [90.666, 86.845, 83.930, 81.565, 80.192, 79.062, 78.116, 77.982, 76.998, 76.684],
|
||||
"mean_map": 61.155,
|
||||
"mean_wearer_ap": 53.493
|
||||
},
|
||||
"causal_valid_only": {
|
||||
"map": [74.204, 68.349, 64.313, 61.128, 59.768, 58.805, 57.498, 57.090, 55.954, 54.821],
|
||||
"background_ap": [68.189, 58.596, 52.373, 47.629, 46.172, 45.840, 43.587, 43.518, 42.227, 40.349],
|
||||
"wearer_ap": [63.750, 59.595, 56.619, 54.172, 52.916, 51.488, 50.765, 49.739, 48.605, 47.393],
|
||||
"others_ap": [90.673, 86.857, 83.947, 81.585, 80.216, 79.088, 78.143, 78.012, 77.031, 76.720],
|
||||
"mean_map": 61.193,
|
||||
"mean_wearer_ap": 53.504
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"raw_boundary_anticipation": {
|
||||
"horizons_seconds": [0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, 2.0],
|
||||
"wearer_onset_ap": [5.139, 9.878, 15.389, 21.093, 27.225, 30.997, 33.563, 34.046, 34.030, 33.550],
|
||||
"wearer_offset_ap": [9.696, 18.846, 27.730, 34.971, 40.646, 45.112, 47.880, 50.444, 52.051, 52.862],
|
||||
"mean_wearer_onset_ap": 24.491,
|
||||
"mean_wearer_offset_ap": 38.024,
|
||||
"timing_derived_eot_hold_mean_ap": 9.872,
|
||||
"timing_derived_yield_mean_ap": 47.688
|
||||
},
|
||||
"opportunity_conditioned_behavior": {
|
||||
"labels": "provisional two-pass LLM-assisted; not human reviewed",
|
||||
"entry": {
|
||||
"positive": 163,
|
||||
"hard_negative": 335,
|
||||
"invalid_or_post_outcome": 81,
|
||||
"average_precision": 52.4867,
|
||||
"positive_prevalence": 32.7309,
|
||||
"ap_lift_points": 19.7558,
|
||||
"ap_over_prevalence": 1.6036
|
||||
},
|
||||
"int_yield": {
|
||||
"positive": 28,
|
||||
"hard_negative": 109,
|
||||
"invalid_or_post_outcome": 5,
|
||||
"average_precision": 20.1349,
|
||||
"positive_prevalence": 20.4380,
|
||||
"ap_lift_points": -0.3031,
|
||||
"ap_over_prevalence": 0.9852
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"threshold_free": true,
|
||||
"session4_required_for_reported_metrics": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user